<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Asus 1008P Seashell Karim Rashid Edition &#8211; first look and some pictures</title> <atom:link href="http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/</link> <description>All you need to know about netbooks, with news and the best reviews and galleries</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-2628</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:24:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-2628</guid> <description>Gunnar, I too like those Asus machines. However, they are pretty heavy. I don&#039;t know about the UL50VT but I&#039;ve tested the 13.3 and 14 inch versions, and while great in terms of power and looks, they are pretty heavy...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunnar, I too like those Asus machines. However, they are pretty heavy. I don&#8217;t know about the UL50VT but I&#8217;ve tested the 13.3 and 14 inch versions, and while great in terms of power and looks, they are pretty heavy&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gunnar-medial</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-2625</link> <dc:creator>gunnar-medial</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:05:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-2625</guid> <description>Nowadays Ï swear by the SU7300 machines (Intel ULV CPU) such as Asus UL50VT. I chose that machine to replace my old office laptop and it gives some 10 hours worktime. Not bad for a 15.4&quot;. If you want smaller the UL30 is a shrunk down model with about the same performance spec.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowadays Ï swear by the SU7300 machines (Intel ULV CPU) such as Asus UL50VT. I chose that machine to replace my old office laptop and it gives some 10 hours worktime. Not bad for a 15.4&#8243;. If you want smaller the UL30 is a shrunk down model with about the same performance spec.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-2619</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:55:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-2619</guid> <description>Benita, if weight is the most important factor for you, check out this post: http://www.netbooklive.com/lightest-netbook-best-options-for-light-mini-laptops-3216/ . All in one though, the 1008P-KR for here is one of your best choices at the moment. Unless you can afford 1500 bucks for the Vaio X...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benita, if weight is the most important factor for you, check out this post: <a
href="http://www.netbooklive.com/lightest-netbook-best-options-for-light-mini-laptops-3216/" rel="nofollow">http://www.netbooklive.com/lightest-netbook-best-options-for-light-mini-laptops-3216/</a> . All in one though, the 1008P-KR for here is one of your best choices at the moment. Unless you can afford 1500 bucks for the Vaio X&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Benita</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-2612</link> <dc:creator>Benita</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:01:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-2612</guid> <description>Hey all,
I am also looking for a new netbook at the moment, obviously my attention was drawn to the KR edition, but same here carrying and swapping batteries is def not an option for me:) Which netbook u consider best?Was looking at the eee 1005 PE which seemed to be a good package deal, but doesn t have to be a asus. what do u think?
Most important criteria for me:
1. very light
2. long batterie
3. good looking
4. windows 7
5. use for social media and office
cheers B</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey all,</p><p>I am also looking for a new netbook at the moment, obviously my attention was drawn to the KR edition, but same here carrying and swapping batteries is def not an option for me:) Which netbook u consider best?Was looking at the eee 1005 PE which seemed to be a good package deal, but doesn t have to be a asus. what do u think?<br
/> Most important criteria for me:<br
/> 1. very light<br
/> 2. long batterie<br
/> 3. good looking<br
/> 4. windows 7<br
/> 5. use for social media and office</p><p>cheers B</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:52:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-2008</guid> <description>It was a big deal :) I still am not satisfied with the idea of having to swap the batteries in order to use and recharge them, but since a better solution could not be find, that will do. And you will never get 12 hours out of that machine with 2 batteries. maybe like 9-10, but definitely not 12 :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a big deal <img
src='http://www.netbooklive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I still am not satisfied with the idea of having to swap the batteries in order to use and recharge them, but since a better solution could not be find, that will do. And you will never get 12 hours out of that machine with 2 batteries. maybe like 9-10, but definitely not 12 <img
src='http://www.netbooklive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gunnar-medial</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-2007</link> <dc:creator>gunnar-medial</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-2007</guid> <description>That review at netbooklive.com presumed that the machine shipped with only one battery slice, thus running at full throttle they only achieved some over 3 hours and made a big fuss out of that.
ASUS did take note and before launch removed that leather bag in favor of two battery slices, so now with the combined set of batteries you get a runtime from 7 to 12 hours depending on load. In more recent tests/reviews I haven&#039;t heard anybody mentioning battery life on the negative list.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That review at netbooklive.com presumed that the machine shipped with only one battery slice, thus running at full throttle they only achieved some over 3 hours and made a big fuss out of that.</p><p>ASUS did take note and before launch removed that leather bag in favor of two battery slices, so now with the combined set of batteries you get a runtime from 7 to 12 hours depending on load. In more recent tests/reviews I haven&#8217;t heard anybody mentioning battery life on the negative list.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-2006</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:13:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-2006</guid> <description>Or even the 1005PE with up to 14 hours (more like 11 in real life). that&#039;s the best right now in terms of battery, next to the MSI Wind u160</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or even the 1005PE with up to 14 hours (more like 11 in real life). that&#8217;s the best right now in terms of battery, next to the MSI Wind u160</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pearlyn</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-2001</link> <dc:creator>pearlyn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:47:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-2001</guid> <description>Hi thanks mike for your answer. Then i think i wont be getting this netbook. Battery life is very important? Maybe 1005ha is a better choice with 10hrs battery life.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi thanks mike for your answer. Then i think i wont be getting this netbook. Battery life is very important? Maybe 1005ha is a better choice with 10hrs battery life.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-1993</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:01:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-1993</guid> <description>It&#039;s around 3.5, could be less, could be more, depending on what you plan to do on this machine. Check out the review in here: http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-kr-review-1623/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s around 3.5, could be less, could be more, depending on what you plan to do on this machine. Check out the review in here: <a
href="http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-kr-review-1623/" rel="nofollow">http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-kr-review-1623/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pearlyn</title><link>http://www.netbooklive.com/asus-1008p-seashell-karim-rashid-1566/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link> <dc:creator>pearlyn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:53:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbooklive.com/?p=1566#comment-1992</guid> <description>The battery life is only 3.5 hrs?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The battery life is only 3.5 hrs?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
